WHAT THE ARTICLE IS ABOUT
The fine structure that makes compliance non-negotiable
Article 99 establishes the EU AI Act’s penalty framework — defining the maximum fines for different categories of violation and requiring member states to lay down effective, proportionate and dissuasive penalties in their national law. It is the financial backbone of AI Act enforcement and the provision that every business operating AI systems in the EU needs to understand.
WHAT IT SAYS
Three tiers of fines — up to EUR 35 million or 7% of global turnover
- Tier 1 — Prohibited AI practices (Article 5): fines of up to EUR 35,000,000 or, for undertakings, up to 7% of total worldwide annual turnover for the preceding financial year, whichever is higher
- Tier 2 — Other violations of the Act (including high-risk AI obligations, GPAI obligations, transparency obligations): fines of up to EUR 15,000,000 or, for undertakings, up to 3% of total worldwide annual turnover, whichever is higher
- Tier 3 — Supply of incorrect, incomplete or misleading information to authorities, notified bodies or other bodies: fines of up to EUR 7,500,000 or, for undertakings, up to 1% of total worldwide annual turnover, whichever is higher
- Member states must lay down national penalty rules that are effective, proportionate and dissuasive — the figures above are maximums, not mandatory amounts
- Penalties must take into account the interests of SMEs and startups, and their economic viability — smaller businesses should face proportionately lower fines
- When deciding on fines, authorities must consider: the nature, gravity, duration and consequences of the infringement; intentionality or negligence; measures taken to mitigate harm; degree of cooperation; and prior infringements
- Natural persons may also be subject to fines where they are personally responsible for infringements
- Penalties imposed on EU institutions, bodies, offices and agencies are governed separately by Article 100
WHO IS AFFECTED
All operators of AI systems — providers, deployers, importers and distributors
- Providers of prohibited AI systems — face the highest Tier 1 fines
- Providers of high-risk AI systems failing to meet Chapter III obligations — Tier 2 fines
- GPAI model providers violating Chapter V obligations — Tier 2 fines
- Any operator supplying false or misleading information to authorities — Tier 3 fines
- Natural persons who are personally responsible for AI Act violations
- National competent authorities who set the actual penalty amounts within the Article 99 maxima
WHAT IT MEANS FOR SMES
The penalties are large — but proportionality and SME protection are built in
- The headline numbers are maximums, not starting points — a first-time, non-deliberate violation by a small business should attract a proportionally much smaller fine than a repeat, deliberate violation by a multinational
- The explicit SME protection clause is significant: authorities are required by law to take your economic viability into account when setting fines — assert this in any enforcement proceeding
- The 1%/3%/7% of global turnover structure means the absolute fine scales with your business size — a EUR 1 million turnover SME faces a maximum Tier 2 fine of EUR 30,000, not EUR 15,000,000
- Cooperation with authorities and voluntary corrective action are listed mitigating factors — taking these steps immediately when an issue is identified reduces your fine exposure
- The false information tier is particularly important: if you are under investigation, the instinct to downplay issues or provide incomplete information creates a separate, additional liability; always provide accurate and complete information to authorities
- Intentionality significantly increases fine risk — negligent non-compliance is treated more favourably than deliberate violation; document your good-faith compliance efforts carefully
Related Articles
- Article 5 — Prohibited AI practices (Tier 1 violations — the highest fine category)
- Article 74 — Market surveillance (the authorities who investigate and recommend fines)
- Article 79 — National enforcement procedure (the procedure that leads to fine imposition)
- Article 101 — Fines for GPAI providers (the specific fine article for GPAI model providers)
