Art.95
EU AI Act Guide › Chapter X — Codes of Conduct and Guidelines › Article 95

Article 95 – Codes of Conduct for Voluntary Application of Specific Requirements

General SME Relevant ~3 min read · 507 words

Article 95 opens Chapter X and establishes voluntary codes of conduct — a mechanism by which providers of AI systems that are not high-risk can voluntarily commit to meeting some or all of the high-risk requirements. It is the Act’s recognition that good AI governance does not end at the compliance threshold, and that voluntary standards have a role to play in raising the bar across the industry.

✓ Low compliance impact for SMEs

WHAT THE ARTICLE IS ABOUT

Voluntary adoption of high-risk standards by non-high-risk AI providers

Article 95 creates a framework for voluntary codes of conduct through which providers of AI systems that are below the high-risk threshold can choose to apply some or all of the technical requirements designed for high-risk systems. The AI Office and member states facilitate and encourage these codes, and the Commission may approve them — giving them a level of official recognition.

WHAT IT SAYS

AI Office facilitates, Commission approves, providers may join voluntarily

  • The AI Office and member states shall encourage and facilitate the drawing up of codes of conduct intended to foster the voluntary application of some or all of Chapter III Section 2 requirements to AI systems other than high-risk systems
  • Codes of conduct may also address ethics principles such as sustainability, accessibility, and diversity
  • The AI Office and member states shall facilitate participation of SMEs including startups, civil society, and other stakeholders in the development of codes
  • Codes are drawn up by individual providers or organisations representing them — the Commission may approve codes that meet specified criteria
  • Approved codes may be used as evidence of responsible AI practices — though they do not create legal presumptions of compliance with mandatory requirements
  • The Commission may evaluate the effectiveness of approved codes and recommend amendments where necessary
  • Participation in approved codes of conduct may be taken into account by market surveillance authorities when assessing an operator’s overall approach to compliance

WHO IS AFFECTED

Providers of non-high-risk AI systems who want to demonstrate responsible practices

  • Providers of AI systems below the high-risk threshold who wish to signal commitment to higher standards
  • Industry associations and organisations developing codes on behalf of their members
  • The AI Office and member states facilitating code development
  • The Commission which may approve codes and evaluate their effectiveness

WHAT IT MEANS FOR SMES

A trust signal and procurement differentiator — without mandatory compliance costs

  • Participation in approved codes of conduct allows you to demonstrate responsible AI practices even if your system is not high-risk and you face no mandatory compliance obligations
  • For B2B AI providers: public sector and large enterprise customers increasingly require evidence of responsible AI practices in procurement — an approved code of conduct provides that evidence
  • The facilitation of SME participation in code development is explicit — engage with your industry association to shape codes that are practical for smaller businesses rather than having standards set by large incumbents
  • Voluntary codes do not create legal liability — participating in a code and then failing to follow it does not automatically create an enforcement risk, but it may affect reputation
  • Monitor which codes the Commission approves — approved codes carry more credibility with customers and procurement teams than informal commitments

Related Articles

← Previous Art. 94 — Procedural Rights of Economic Operators of the General-Purpose AI Model Next → Art. 96 — Guidelines from the Commission on the Implementation of this Regulation