Art.76

Article 76 – Supervision of Testing in Real World Conditions by Market Surveillance Authorities

Governance SME Relevant ~2 min read · 384 words

Article 76 defines the supervisory role of market surveillance authorities during real-world AI testing under Article 60. It ensures that the testing pathway — which allows pre-market field trials outside sandboxes — operates under active regulatory oversight rather than as an unsupervised loophole.

✓ Low compliance impact for SMEs

WHAT THE ARTICLE IS ABOUT

Regulatory oversight during pre-market AI field trials

Article 76 establishes that market surveillance authorities have supervisory responsibility over real-world testing of high-risk AI systems conducted under Article 60. It gives authorities the power to intervene if testing poses risks, ensures testing plans are followed, and creates coordination mechanisms for cross-border testing activities.

WHAT IT SAYS

Authorities supervise, may intervene, and coordinate cross-border

Market surveillance authorities are responsible for supervising real-world testing activities conducted under Article 60 in their territory
They may request information from providers or prospective providers conducting testing at any time during the testing period
Where testing poses a risk to health, safety or fundamental rights, authorities may suspend or terminate the testing and require corrective action
Where testing involves multiple member states, the authorities of the member states concerned must coordinate their supervision activities
The AI Office coordinates at EU level where testing involves Union-wide concerns or GPAI models
Authorities may inspect testing sites and request access to test data, results and documentation
The supervising authority receives the registration information submitted to the EU database under Article 60

WHO IS AFFECTED

Providers conducting real-world testing and the authorities supervising them

Providers or prospective providers conducting real-world testing under Article 60
Market surveillance authorities in the member states where testing takes place
The AI Office for GPAI model testing or multi-country testing coordination
Test subjects — the authority’s power to suspend testing protects them from ongoing harm

WHAT IT MEANS FOR SMES

Testing supervision is active — engage with your authority proactively

Real-world testing is not self-regulated — authorities have active oversight and can intervene at any point
Proactive communication with your supervising authority during the testing period is good practice — inform them of any issues or deviations from the plan before they discover them independently
A testing suspension is a significant disruption to your development timeline — design your testing programme conservatively to avoid triggering the risk threshold that would lead to suspension
If your testing crosses member state borders, expect coordination between multiple national authorities and ensure your testing plan is consistent and coherent across all jurisdictions

Article 60 — Real world testing (the testing procedure this article supervises)
Article 74 — Market surveillance (the general powers authorities exercise here)
Article 61 — Informed consent (which authorities verify is properly obtained)
Article 75 — Mutual assistance (the cross-border coordination framework)

← Back to the Guide