Art.28
EU AI Act Guide › Chapter III — High-Risk AI Systems › Article 28

Article 28 — Notifying Authorities

Governance SME Relevant ~2 min read · 461 words

Article 28 opens Section 4 of Chapter III, which deals with the governance of notified bodies — the independent organisations that carry out third-party conformity assessments of high-risk AI systems. Article 28 establishes the national notifying authorities responsible for overseeing and designating those bodies in each EU member state.

✓ Low compliance impact for SMEs

WHAT THE ARTICLE IS ABOUT

The national bodies that oversee AI conformity assessors

Article 28 requires each EU member state to designate or establish a notifying authority — the national body responsible for assessing, designating, and monitoring the conformity assessment bodies that audit high-risk AI systems. Notifying authorities are a governance infrastructure layer that most businesses will never deal with directly, but which underpin the entire third-party conformity assessment system.

WHAT IT SAYS

One per member state, independent, and expertise-equipped

  • Each member state must designate or establish at least one notifying authority responsible for the assessment, designation and monitoring of conformity assessment bodies
  • Member states may designate a national accreditation body to fulfil these functions
  • Notifying authorities must be legally distinct from the conformity assessment bodies they oversee — no conflicts of interest are permitted
  • They must operate with objectivity and impartiality and must not offer services that conformity assessment bodies provide, nor any commercial consultancy
  • Notifying authorities must have sufficient competent personnel with expertise in AI technology, law, and fundamental rights supervision
  • They must safeguard the confidentiality of information they obtain in performing their functions
  • Member states must notify the Commission of their designated notifying authority and any subsequent changes

WHO IS AFFECTED

Member states and conformity assessment bodies — not businesses directly

  • EU member state governments — obliged to designate or establish a notifying authority
  • Existing national accreditation bodies that may take on the notifying authority function
  • Conformity assessment bodies seeking designation as notified bodies — they deal directly with notifying authorities
  • Providers of high-risk AI systems requiring third-party conformity assessment — they choose from notified bodies designated by these authorities

WHAT IT MEANS FOR SMES

Background infrastructure — but relevant when you need a notified body

  • For the vast majority of SMEs, this article is background context rather than a direct compliance obligation
  • Where it becomes relevant: if your high-risk AI system requires third-party conformity assessment under Article 43, you will select a notified body from the official list — that list is maintained by notifying authorities under this article
  • The requirement for notifying authorities to be independent and conflict-free is a quality assurance mechanism that protects providers — it means the bodies assessing your conformity are genuinely independent
  • Check the NANDO database (the EU’s official register of notified bodies) when you need to select a conformity assessment body — this is the practical output of the notifying authority system
  • Your own national notifying authority is the body to contact if you have questions about which conformity assessment bodies are designated in your member state

Related Articles

← Previous Art. 27 — Fundamental Rights Impact Assessment for High-Risk AI Systems Next → Art. 29 — Application of a Conformity Assessment Body for Notification