WHAT THE ARTICLE IS ABOUT
The national bodies that oversee AI conformity assessors
Article 28 requires each EU member state to designate or establish a notifying authority — the national body responsible for assessing, designating, and monitoring the conformity assessment bodies that audit high-risk AI systems. Notifying authorities are a governance infrastructure layer that most businesses will never deal with directly, but which underpin the entire third-party conformity assessment system.
WHAT IT SAYS
One per member state, independent, and expertise-equipped
- Each member state must designate or establish at least one notifying authority responsible for the assessment, designation and monitoring of conformity assessment bodies
- Member states may designate a national accreditation body to fulfil these functions
- Notifying authorities must be legally distinct from the conformity assessment bodies they oversee — no conflicts of interest are permitted
- They must operate with objectivity and impartiality and must not offer services that conformity assessment bodies provide, nor any commercial consultancy
- Notifying authorities must have sufficient competent personnel with expertise in AI technology, law, and fundamental rights supervision
- They must safeguard the confidentiality of information they obtain in performing their functions
- Member states must notify the Commission of their designated notifying authority and any subsequent changes
WHO IS AFFECTED
Member states and conformity assessment bodies — not businesses directly
- EU member state governments — obliged to designate or establish a notifying authority
- Existing national accreditation bodies that may take on the notifying authority function
- Conformity assessment bodies seeking designation as notified bodies — they deal directly with notifying authorities
- Providers of high-risk AI systems requiring third-party conformity assessment — they choose from notified bodies designated by these authorities
WHAT IT MEANS FOR SMES
Background infrastructure — but relevant when you need a notified body
- For the vast majority of SMEs, this article is background context rather than a direct compliance obligation
- Where it becomes relevant: if your high-risk AI system requires third-party conformity assessment under Article 43, you will select a notified body from the official list — that list is maintained by notifying authorities under this article
- The requirement for notifying authorities to be independent and conflict-free is a quality assurance mechanism that protects providers — it means the bodies assessing your conformity are genuinely independent
- Check the NANDO database (the EU’s official register of notified bodies) when you need to select a conformity assessment body — this is the practical output of the notifying authority system
- Your own national notifying authority is the body to contact if you have questions about which conformity assessment bodies are designated in your member state
Related Articles
- Article 29 — Application for notification (how conformity assessment bodies apply to become notified)
- Article 31 — Requirements for notified bodies (the standards notifying authorities assess against)
- Article 43 — Conformity assessment (when providers must engage notified bodies)
- Article 35 — Identification numbers and lists of notified bodies (the public register)
